gc_chahiye
09-17 12:38 AM
can you reword the title? I am not sure how that title is accurate given the background of how macaca was used: Sidharth (who was born and raised in the US, but is of of Indian origin) was called Macaca by George Allen because of the color of his skin. Getting a GC or not getting a GC does not change the color of one's skin so it does not stop people from calling you a macaca...
wallpaper Superbad Script
Mayday
04-03 06:11 PM
came back to US on dec 30. Didnt get paid for the month of sept oct nov dec. But i was never out of status as I was in india. ... i have paystubs till aug 30 2009. never out of status
You actually were out of status since Dec 30 till this moment and you still are out of status. You are immediately out of status once you are not paid for the job or fired, regardless of the fact if employer revokes H-1 or not.
You can not do H-1 transfer any more. Your next H-1 petition will be a new petition but you will not be subject to H-1 cap as you already have been counted for 6 years.
So I presume it would safe to get a job offer and leave as soon as possible, then wait for the H-1 petition get approved, stamp H-1 visa and get back.
You actually were out of status since Dec 30 till this moment and you still are out of status. You are immediately out of status once you are not paid for the job or fired, regardless of the fact if employer revokes H-1 or not.
You can not do H-1 transfer any more. Your next H-1 petition will be a new petition but you will not be subject to H-1 cap as you already have been counted for 6 years.
So I presume it would safe to get a job offer and leave as soon as possible, then wait for the H-1 petition get approved, stamp H-1 visa and get back.
psychman
11-18 01:59 AM
Hi Kirupa. Thank you very much for the link. That did help clear things up. I think I could still benefit from seeing an example if you wouldn't mind sending one? Thanks!
2011 For the record: Kevin Smith:
Ann Ruben
06-28 10:20 PM
An article entitled File Retention and Relinquishing to Client - Posted on March 31st, 2010 can be found on the website for the MO Supreme Court Advisory Committe for Legal Ethics:Office of the Legal Ethics Counsel - Articles (http://www.mo-legal-ethics.org/modules.php?name=Articles). I hope this is helpful.
more...
MetteBB
05-11 02:53 AM
maybe make the colours a bit nicer? and add a price aswell... makes it look a lot more like a stamp.
But I like the dual stamp idea! Well done :pleased:
/mette
But I like the dual stamp idea! Well done :pleased:
/mette
jliechty
March 5th, 2005, 09:39 PM
I'll throw in my very non-expert opinion here, having shot just a few weddings basically in your position.
The dress in the first shot is blown out. I might have angled the vertical dimension a bit lower to capture the full length portraits and avoid so much "dead space" at the top.
The composition on the second one is ok, but the eyes are rolling all over the room (bad grammar intentional). Since I've never shot in a paid position where I had the authority to exclude other photography during the group shots (not that I would even then), I generally defer first to the "guest" photographers, telling everyone to take their turn one at a time, and to speak up before the photo to get the subjects looking at them. Then I take over the attention and get everyone to look at me for however many shots I need to take of that pose. BTW, it's always good to take a few shots of each pose, because you're almost guaranteed to have closed eyes in different shots. I'm sure the pros will be in shortly to fill us both in on a better way to do this (I'd appreciate that, too). :)
The fill flash was done excellently, but the background is very contrasty and thus distracting.
This is just MHO, and probably doesn't amount to much. Also, please don't feel bad - I've made most of these mistakes myself (and managed to pull off some others that you didn't think of). :o ;)
The dress in the first shot is blown out. I might have angled the vertical dimension a bit lower to capture the full length portraits and avoid so much "dead space" at the top.
The composition on the second one is ok, but the eyes are rolling all over the room (bad grammar intentional). Since I've never shot in a paid position where I had the authority to exclude other photography during the group shots (not that I would even then), I generally defer first to the "guest" photographers, telling everyone to take their turn one at a time, and to speak up before the photo to get the subjects looking at them. Then I take over the attention and get everyone to look at me for however many shots I need to take of that pose. BTW, it's always good to take a few shots of each pose, because you're almost guaranteed to have closed eyes in different shots. I'm sure the pros will be in shortly to fill us both in on a better way to do this (I'd appreciate that, too). :)
The fill flash was done excellently, but the background is very contrasty and thus distracting.
This is just MHO, and probably doesn't amount to much. Also, please don't feel bad - I've made most of these mistakes myself (and managed to pull off some others that you didn't think of). :o ;)
more...
Blog Feeds
04-26 11:30 AM
Some 63,000 flights had been canceled in Europe by the end of Sunday, in the four days since the air space of northern Europe was shut down by an enormous ash cloud from an erupting volcano beneath the Eyjafjallajokull glacier in Iceland.
Passengers are scrambling to find alternative travel routes. German tourists are being bussed home from Spain, while the Royal Navy is sending military ships to Spain to bring home stranded Brits. Thousand of Europeans are also stuck in the US with no option to leave at this time. Many visitors are worried about the implications of not being able to leave before their current status expires.
Foreign nationals stranded in the U.S. because of the airport closures in Europe due to the Icelandic volcano eruption and who are about to exceed their authorized stay in the U.S. have two avenues for relief. If at an airport and traveling under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP), they should contact the U.S. Customs and Border Protection office at the airport. They may also contact the local U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services office. Both Department of Homeland Security agencies have provided their staff and offices with guidance on the applicable legal authorities under the VWP in circumstances such as this.
Persons traveling under a visa should contact the nearest USCIS office and follow the instructions below. While these instructions recommend initiating the process 45 days in advance, USCIS is providing reminder guidance on how to handle such cases until normal flights are scheduled between the U.S. and foreign countries affected by the Icelandic volcanic activity.
We keep monitoring the situation and will update our readers as we obtain more news.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/04/b2_tourists_and_visa_waiver_op.html)
Passengers are scrambling to find alternative travel routes. German tourists are being bussed home from Spain, while the Royal Navy is sending military ships to Spain to bring home stranded Brits. Thousand of Europeans are also stuck in the US with no option to leave at this time. Many visitors are worried about the implications of not being able to leave before their current status expires.
Foreign nationals stranded in the U.S. because of the airport closures in Europe due to the Icelandic volcano eruption and who are about to exceed their authorized stay in the U.S. have two avenues for relief. If at an airport and traveling under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP), they should contact the U.S. Customs and Border Protection office at the airport. They may also contact the local U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services office. Both Department of Homeland Security agencies have provided their staff and offices with guidance on the applicable legal authorities under the VWP in circumstances such as this.
Persons traveling under a visa should contact the nearest USCIS office and follow the instructions below. While these instructions recommend initiating the process 45 days in advance, USCIS is providing reminder guidance on how to handle such cases until normal flights are scheduled between the U.S. and foreign countries affected by the Icelandic volcanic activity.
We keep monitoring the situation and will update our readers as we obtain more news.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/04/b2_tourists_and_visa_waiver_op.html)
2010 Super Bad 2on2 BBOY BATTLE 2009/04/30 Soul Sonic Boogie @ Roppongi
onemorecame
07-25 02:27 PM
Please let me know. My lawyer has taken my personal checks and sent them to USCIS...
Yes you are fine...
Yes you are fine...
more...
Legal
07-23 10:41 AM
For EB3 case, after receiving the approval for I 140, I know that we have to wait till DOL Proiority Date is current to be able to file for I485.
If we decide to receive the green card in any consulars overseas, can we just go ahead and file the I485 after getting the I140 approval? (without waiting for PD to be current):
I am sorry to put it to you this way...............
but you are deep inside in a hopeless tunnel and you have delusions that there may be a hole you can escape through. Nope.
If we decide to receive the green card in any consulars overseas, can we just go ahead and file the I485 after getting the I140 approval? (without waiting for PD to be current):
I am sorry to put it to you this way...............
but you are deep inside in a hopeless tunnel and you have delusions that there may be a hole you can escape through. Nope.
hair Cops scene from Superbad
milind70
09-28 03:16 PM
Hi all,
Please let me know what could be the problem. On Apr25, my status changed to Case Received and Pending. Last Updated Date is 05/18.
When i contacted my employer, he says my petition is approved. But still when i find the status online, it's not reflected.
What could be the problem?
Any thoughts would be highly aprpeciated.
Thanks,
Santhosh
Looks like most probably a glitch in the USCIS online system.Many members have posted the problem you posted above
Please let me know what could be the problem. On Apr25, my status changed to Case Received and Pending. Last Updated Date is 05/18.
When i contacted my employer, he says my petition is approved. But still when i find the status online, it's not reflected.
What could be the problem?
Any thoughts would be highly aprpeciated.
Thanks,
Santhosh
Looks like most probably a glitch in the USCIS online system.Many members have posted the problem you posted above
more...
sumanitha
11-14 10:44 AM
I need a immigration lawyer whom I can consult today, It is an emergency case and need his help immediately.
Can anyone please suggest me a lawyer in Dallas, TX who works today (Saturday) to get help.
Help highly appreciated.
Can anyone please suggest me a lawyer in Dallas, TX who works today (Saturday) to get help.
Help highly appreciated.
hot Superbad - scene with mum
vdlrao
01-06 02:03 PM
Theres no legal Immigration question in that?
more...
house Superbad
greencard_fever
06-25 06:09 PM
Hi All,
First of all Congrats! to all people who are eligible to file 485 in july..
i have strage problem..i am not weather its a problem or not..i have filed my GC in 2004 December and you all know that after that the BEC process came in every thing went to BEC's..and i had no hope on that file and i asked my employer to process my GC under PERM process in 2006 april and i got the Labor and I-140 approved in 6 months...and mean while i got the 2004 labor approved in Feb 2007 and asked my employer which one will be the best and he recommended me apply for I-140 for 2004 labor and wait untill the dates become current and he was expecting the 2004 will become current...so we have applied for I-140 for 2004 labor on May 1st 2007 and the status is pending...now my questios is..
1) Is there is any problem if i use the 2004 labor and apply for I-485.
2) When attorney file for I-140 did they mention any where in that forms that i do not have any immigration petiton has been submited before?
3) If they mention no (miss communication) and applied for I-140 for 2004 labor but in fact there is a petition (I-140) submited for me for my 2006 labor.will this be a problem for my 485 approval?
4) which one will be the best for me to use now 2004 or 2006?
5) I spoke to my attorney on this and he said as long as you have not filed for 485 for 2006 labor then there is no harm.But i am concernet about that if my attorney (2004 labor) mentioned that i have not submited any immigartion petition when he filed for I-140,which is not correct since i have appled for I-140 for 2006 labor will that be a problem for my I-485 process?
you help on this is greately appreciated
Thanks in advance!
First of all Congrats! to all people who are eligible to file 485 in july..
i have strage problem..i am not weather its a problem or not..i have filed my GC in 2004 December and you all know that after that the BEC process came in every thing went to BEC's..and i had no hope on that file and i asked my employer to process my GC under PERM process in 2006 april and i got the Labor and I-140 approved in 6 months...and mean while i got the 2004 labor approved in Feb 2007 and asked my employer which one will be the best and he recommended me apply for I-140 for 2004 labor and wait untill the dates become current and he was expecting the 2004 will become current...so we have applied for I-140 for 2004 labor on May 1st 2007 and the status is pending...now my questios is..
1) Is there is any problem if i use the 2004 labor and apply for I-485.
2) When attorney file for I-140 did they mention any where in that forms that i do not have any immigration petiton has been submited before?
3) If they mention no (miss communication) and applied for I-140 for 2004 labor but in fact there is a petition (I-140) submited for me for my 2006 labor.will this be a problem for my 485 approval?
4) which one will be the best for me to use now 2004 or 2006?
5) I spoke to my attorney on this and he said as long as you have not filed for 485 for 2006 labor then there is no harm.But i am concernet about that if my attorney (2004 labor) mentioned that i have not submited any immigartion petition when he filed for I-140,which is not correct since i have appled for I-140 for 2006 labor will that be a problem for my I-485 process?
you help on this is greately appreciated
Thanks in advance!
tattoo Super bad#39;s new license
sounakc
05-28 07:43 AM
Dear All,
I am filing AOS for my wife. I noticed G-325A is only single page now, I remember when I submitted mine it was 5 pages. Is it changed to 1 page only or I need to make 5 copies of that single page.
I am submitting AOS and EAD, according to my understanding only 2 photo for AOS and 2 photo for EAD, total 4 photos are required. I saw in some forum they are saying about 6 photos. Am I missing anything...
Thanks
sounak
I am filing AOS for my wife. I noticed G-325A is only single page now, I remember when I submitted mine it was 5 pages. Is it changed to 1 page only or I need to make 5 copies of that single page.
I am submitting AOS and EAD, according to my understanding only 2 photo for AOS and 2 photo for EAD, total 4 photos are required. I saw in some forum they are saying about 6 photos. Am I missing anything...
Thanks
sounak
more...
pictures Superbad : Store Rob Scene
nk2
07-21 04:22 PM
/\/\/\/\/\
dresses Dismissing Superbad back in
wandmaker
12-04 12:13 PM
immigal: I don't foresee any issues, AP is just an insurance to re-enter the country. Good luck!
more...
makeup Superbad L.A. Premiere Photos
kgaurav77
04-05 02:51 AM
Hi,
My employer applied for my PERM and i-140 in 2005 in the EB-2 category. Both were approved.
In 2007, I left my employer to pursue an MBA, and converted my H-1B to F-1 visa. Now I am planning to return to my old employer.
I would like to know whether
a) if my employer did not revoke my i-140, is my old PERM still vaild? Can I apply for a new I-140 and a new I-485 using my old approved PERM.
b) if my employer did revoke my i-140, is my old PERM still vaid? I know I can retain the priority date, but was wondering what is the status of my old PERM?
Any help is appreciated.
I know that PERM is valid only for 180 days, and an i-140 has to be filed within that time, which was done in my case. However, does the law say anything about PERM validity if the i-140 is revoked?
My employer applied for my PERM and i-140 in 2005 in the EB-2 category. Both were approved.
In 2007, I left my employer to pursue an MBA, and converted my H-1B to F-1 visa. Now I am planning to return to my old employer.
I would like to know whether
a) if my employer did not revoke my i-140, is my old PERM still vaild? Can I apply for a new I-140 and a new I-485 using my old approved PERM.
b) if my employer did revoke my i-140, is my old PERM still vaid? I know I can retain the priority date, but was wondering what is the status of my old PERM?
Any help is appreciated.
I know that PERM is valid only for 180 days, and an i-140 has to be filed within that time, which was done in my case. However, does the law say anything about PERM validity if the i-140 is revoked?
girlfriend Superbad (2007)
Biking
05-30 04:54 PM
Can anyone tell me how long it will take to receive card after receiving welcome email?
hairstyles cop,bad boys,street kings
nousername
07-22 07:51 PM
No it is not but the chances of getting a stamp is higher or at least it use to me.
I remember going through the same thing few years back but then economy was not as bad it is today. Always remember the guy's job at US Embassies is to stop people from coming or act like a gate keeper.
Just carry all your supporting documents like:
Tax returns
Offer letter
Letter from the company stating your continuous employment
Pay stubs
Bank statemen
ts and any assets you might have in the US (property, etc.)
Good luck
I remember going through the same thing few years back but then economy was not as bad it is today. Always remember the guy's job at US Embassies is to stop people from coming or act like a gate keeper.
Just carry all your supporting documents like:
Tax returns
Offer letter
Letter from the company stating your continuous employment
Pay stubs
Bank statemen
ts and any assets you might have in the US (property, etc.)
Good luck
_k_
05-11 02:02 AM
I came in US with my family when I was 15-16, back then we were on L2, then as time passed by we switched to H4. Then I turned 21 so I had to go on Student Visa (F1). Still living in US legally.
Now my question is I've been staying in US over 10 years now, legally. I dont know if its rumor or not, but someone told me, that you can apply for Green Card if you lived in US over 10 years legally, is that true?
Going through all that H1B process sounds really hectic. Also all my family members, friends and relatives are here, I don't know anyone back in my birthplace. any suggestions or tips, would help a bit.
thanks :)
Now my question is I've been staying in US over 10 years now, legally. I dont know if its rumor or not, but someone told me, that you can apply for Green Card if you lived in US over 10 years legally, is that true?
Going through all that H1B process sounds really hectic. Also all my family members, friends and relatives are here, I don't know anyone back in my birthplace. any suggestions or tips, would help a bit.
thanks :)
Aluwal
08-20 10:05 AM
As per my knowledge based on the forums your wife will also receives EAD.
Be patience�
Be patience�
No comments:
Post a Comment